Search

BLOG

Fee for Intervention – The Essentials Part Two Challenging an FFI Invoice

Blog image

In last week’s post we explained what Fee for Intervention (FFI) is, the controversy surrounding it and how it can affect businesses (read the post here).  

It is important that businesses check the notification of contravention sent by HSE setting out the alleged material breach to see whether they agree there has been a breach and if they agree with HSE about how the risk should be managed.

Martin Temple in his January 2014 report of his Triennial Review of HSE wrote:

“......health and safety legislation is goal setting and risk based.  This means that the discussion that takes place between the regulator and the regulated about what is reasonably practicable is vital.” (para 3.16)

Sadly this discussion does not always take place.

Even if the dutyholder agrees there has been a material breach then the FFI invoice needs to be checked to ensure the amount claimed is justified.   

If the business disagrees with HSE about the alleged breach of health and safety law and/or the amount charged in the invoice then there is a process for challenging.

The Procedure for Challenging Fee For Intervention

There are strict time limits for challenging FFI.  There is a two stage process: (1) Query; and (2) Dispute.

Query

Time runs not from the receipt of the notification of contravention but from receipt of the invoice which will be received later.  Within 21 days the dutyholder must write to the FFI Team saying setting out why the invoice is being challenged and the grounds for the challenge.  The query will usually be determined by the inspector’s line manager.  No charge will be made for the query stage.

If you plan to dispute an Fee For Intervention invoice for reasons such as you, disagree that your organisation committed a material breach, or you dispute the amount of time spent on the investigation as stated in the invoice, then in the first instance your dispute will be treated as a query with no charge attached.

Dispute

If the query is unsuccessful a dispute must be raised in writing to the FFI Team within 21 days of the date of the decision.  

In the notice of dispute you should include the following information:

  • Invoice number – included on the HSE invoice;        

  • Customer Reference– included on the HSE invoice;        

  • Name of the organisation to which the invoice was sent;         

  • The name of the individual disputing the invoice;       

  • The specific reason(s) for disputing the invoice (see Paragraph 16 and Annex 1); and        

  • Confirmation of whether the dispute relates to all or only part of the invoice.

If you are only disputing part of the invoice, you must state this clearly in your notice and pay the undisputed part of the invoice within thirty days from the date of the invoice or no later than ten days after you have been notified of the outcome of your query if that is later.

Disputes are considered by a Disputes Panel, comprising of HSE staff (senior managers who were in no way involved in the issuing of the disputed invoice) and an independent representative drawn from a pool of industry and Trade Union representatives.

The Panel will review the case to ascertain whether or not the amount owing on the invoice should be upheld, varied or cancelled.

The decision of the Panel will be sent to you within 15 days of the decision being made.

If the dispute is not upheld, you must pay the invoice within ten working days.  You will then receive an additional invoice regarding HSE’s costs of dealing with the dispute charged at £124 per hour.

If HSE in addition serves an improvement or prohibition notice and this is successfully challenged or if HSE prosecutes and the dutyholder is acquitted then any money paid under the FFI regime will be refunded.

Future Impact

Often businesses take the view that it is easier to pay the invoice rather than challenge it.  However it must be remembered that the first invoice received may not be the only one and there may be further charges later.  Also, as explained last week, HSE’s finding may have an impact on later proceedings and may also adversely affect your business’ ability to tender for work.  Therefore businesses are well advised to seek specialist legal advice.

In next week’s article, we will be discussing the information you can gather about an HSE’s investigation from the Fee For Intervention notice.

Fisher Scoggins Waters are a London based law firm who are experts in construction, manufacturing and engineering matters.  We provide tailored advice and emergency response for health and safety matters occurring within these industries.  If you would like to discuss any points raised in this article, please phone us on 0207 993 6960.

Follow our company page on linkedin for future updates and our views on the latest developments

Please leave a comment

Enter the name you would like to appear on the comment.
(required)
Enter the email you would like to use to get updates. You email is not visible and can not be used by other users.
(required)
Enter you comment help.

 
  Post Comment

Book Launch - 27 November 2019

Will you be joining us?

HSE and Environment Agency prosecution: A new climate

27 November 2019 | Bloomsbury, 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP

Event Registration

First name
Surname
Email address
Any additional information
Post/Event URL
Post/Event Title
CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below.

Tag Cloud

‘fit for purpose’ obligations 2016 Adjudication adjudication lawyer Adjudication Notice Adjudication process appeal appointing an adjudicator Arbitration Artificial Intelligence Asbestos benefits of off-site construction bonfires book launch breach of contract Brexit Building Defects business interruption Business Interruption Insurance CDM CDM Regulations chambers and partners Charlotte Waters civil proceedings claim payments Claims client COMAH commercial contracts complex construction claims Compliance compulsory sprinklers in warehouses consequential loss construction Construction Construction & Engineering construction contract Construction contract dispute Construction contracts Construction dispute construction dispute lawyer construction dispute resolution construction dispute resolution solicitor construction dispute solicitors Construction Disputes Resolution Construction industry Construction Magazine contracts Contribution claim Corporate Manslaughter Corporate Responsibility costs criminal investigation criminal proceedings cut out fuse Defective Building Work Defective Premises Act developer developers disadvantages of off-site construction Disaster disaster claim Disasters Dispute dispute resolution Disputes DPA Dr Louise Smail Emergency response Emergency Response Solicitors enforcement notices Engineering Engineering dispute Environment Agency environment law Environmental Environmental Agency Environmental damage Environmental Law environmental waste EU EU Procurement Europe Evidence Expert evidence expert witness falls from height Fatal Accidents fee for intervention Fees For Intervention FFI FIDIC Contracts fine Fines Fire Fire Claim fire claims fire damage fire damage lawyers fire sprinkler systems fireworks flood flood claim flood damage food hygiene Fracking fracking claims Fraudulent claims FSW Gross Negligence Manslaughter Guide to Adjudication H&S fine increases; health and safety fines; Health & Safety health & safety breach health & safety sentences health & safety sentencing guidelines health & safety sentencing large corporations health and safety health and safety Health and Safety Executive heave Higher Fines Honey Rose v R How to appoint an adjudicator HSE Insolvency insolvent insurance Insurance Act 2015 insurance bill Insurance Broker insurance claim insurance cover Insurance Disclosure Insurance Disclosure insurance dispute insurance dispute solicitors Insurance Warranties ISO 45001 join us joint venture Judicial Review latest news Law Lawyer legal 500 legal advice privilege Legal Expense Insurance legal professional privilege legal retainers Liability Liquidated Damages Litigation litigation privilege local bodies magistrates’ courts Major Property Damage Manufacturing Martinisation material breach Mediation Michael Appleby Micheal appleby modern methods of construction (MMC) modular construction Mr. Gutaj Notice of adjudication panel firms party wall Performance Bond planning powers of an adjudicator pre-fabrication procurement procurement injunction procurement model Property Damage property danage Public Contract Public Contracts Public Contracts Regulations public procurement public procurement challenges public procurement relationship public sector Publicity Order PUWER recruitment regulation 11 Relief Resolution riot Riot Compensation Act 2016 Risk Risk Assessment safety in the workplace Sanctions Self-build sentence sentencing sentencing guidelines Serious Fraud Office SME Sneller Sony specialist risk and safety consultant Statute Barred Sub-Contractors subrogation subsidance subsidence TCC TCC Guidance team Technology and Construction Court The Adjudicator’s Decision and Costs The Enterprise Act The Lord Young Reforms The Powers Of An Adjudicator The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 The referral notice and response Training tree root UK Underwriters Warehouse insurance Warranties waste water damage WEEE What is Adjudication? what should an adjudication refal notice contain work equipment

Search The Site

Accreditations

 

The Legal 500 - The Clients Guide to Law Firms


Contact Us Now For Advice And Guidance

Enter your name
Enter your surname
Enter your Email
Ask us a Question?