Search

BLOG

Fee For Intervention – The Essentials : Part One FFI Explained

Blog image

Fee for Intervention, also referred to as FFI, was implemented on 1st October 2012 and is the Health and Safety Executive’s (HSE) recovery scheme.  Under The Health and Safety (Fees) Regulations 2012, the HSE has a duty to recover the cost of its investigations from organisations found to be in material breach of health and safety law.

The cost recovery regime was implemented in response to the 35% budget cut delivered by the Government in 2011.  And the implementation of the scheme has not been without controversy as we shall see.

Who Is Subject to Fee For Intervention?

In order for an FFI to apply, the breach in question must be either of a general duty under the  Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 or Regulations made under the Act. 

FFI applies to anyone who owes a duty under health and safety legislation where the HSE is the enforcing authority and includes:

  • Employers         

  • Self-employed people who put others at risk          

  • Public and limited companies

  • General, limited and limited liability partnerships        

FFI does not apply to licensable work with asbestos by those who hold a licence under the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 or to work activities involving biological agents at containment levels one to four.

What is a Material Breach?

A material breach is when, in the opinion of the HSE Inspector, there is or has been a contravention of health and safety law that requires them to issue a notice in writing of that opinion to the dutyholder. 

Written notification from an HSE inspector may be by a notification of contravention, an improvement or prohibition notice, or a prosecution and must include the following information:

  • The law that the inspector’s opinion relates to;          

  • The reasons for their opinion; and          

  • Notification that a fee is payable to HSE

 

How Much is the Fee?

The total fee is based on an hourly rate of £124 per hour.  Inspectors will invoice for the time they have spent identifying the breach, advising on putting it right, investigating, and taking enforcement action. Included is all time spent on carrying out visits, all time on the site during which the material breach was identified, the writing of letters, notices, reports, taking statements and getting specialist reports for complex issues.

 

Chargeable time runs from the start of the visit when the material breach is identified. Payment is due within 30 days and is treated as a civil debt if not paid.

 

According to HSE’s Small Business Trade Association Forum, Hot topics Fact Sheet 10, 3 December 2015, the average Fee For Intervention invoice is now £755.11 with the largest invoice so far being £201,150.14

 

Controversy Surrounding Fee For Intervention


Richard Judge, the CEO of HSE, made it very clear in an interview conducted in 2015 that FFI was not to be seen as a fee generating mechanism but as an enforcement tool, in the same way that in environmental enforcement the ‘polluter pays’.


The Department of Work and Pensions appointed Mr Martin Temple, Chair of EEF, to undertake the Triennial Review of HSE.  In his report dated 9 January 2014 he said of FFI:

 

“...I am very concerned at the strength of feeling from stakeholders that FFI damages HSE’s reputation for acting impartially and independently.  I comment on it here because of the impact it appears to be having on HSE’s reputation for independence and its integrity as a regulator” (para 3.120)

 

He went on to say:

 

“[It] is a dangerous model which links, directly or indirectly, the funding of the regulator to its income from ‘fines’” (para 3.120)

 

Impact of Fee For Intervention

 

There are concerns about how a finding of a ‘material breach’ might affect a dutyholder in the future if left unchallenged.  Mr Peter McNaught, Chief Legal Adviser to HSE, in an interview with 2 Hare Court Chambers published in March 2013 would not rule out notifications of contravention under FFI being used as evidence of guilty or previous warning or bad character in future criminal proceedings.  It may also impact on a company’s ability to tender for new work:  there is an increasing trend for pre qualification questionnaires (PQQs) to ask not only if the company has had enforcement action taken against it in the last three years but also if it has had a findings of material breach under FFI 


In next week’s article, we will explain the procedure for successfully challenging Fee For Intervention.

 

Fisher Scoggins Waters are a London based law firm who are experts in construction, manufacturing and engineering matters.  We provide tailored advice and emergency response for health and safety matters occurring in these industries.  If you would like to discuss any points raised in this article, please phone us on 0207 993 6960.

Follow our company page on linkedin for future updates and our views on the latest developments

Categories: Health & Safety

Please leave a comment

Enter the name you would like to appear on the comment.
(required)
Enter the email you would like to use to get updates. You email is not visible and can not be used by other users.
(required)
Enter you comment help.

 
  Post Comment

Book Launch - 27 November 2019

Will you be joining us?

HSE and Environment Agency prosecution: A new climate

27 November 2019 | Bloomsbury, 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP

Event Registration

First name
Surname
Email address
Any additional information
Post/Event URL
Post/Event Title
CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below.

Tag Cloud

‘fit for purpose’ obligations 2016 Adjudication adjudication lawyer Adjudication Notice Adjudication process appeal appointing an adjudicator Arbitration Artificial Intelligence Asbestos benefits of off-site construction bonfires book launch breach of contract Brexit Building Defects business interruption Business Interruption Insurance CDM CDM Regulations chambers and partners Charlotte Waters civil proceedings claim payments Claims client COMAH commercial contracts complex construction claims Compliance compulsory sprinklers in warehouses consequential loss construction Construction Construction & Engineering construction contract Construction contract dispute Construction contracts Construction dispute construction dispute lawyer construction dispute resolution construction dispute resolution solicitor construction dispute solicitors Construction Disputes Resolution Construction industry Construction Magazine contracts Contribution claim Corporate Manslaughter Corporate Responsibility costs criminal investigation criminal proceedings cut out fuse Defective Building Work Defective Premises Act developer developers disadvantages of off-site construction Disaster disaster claim Disasters Dispute dispute resolution Disputes DPA Dr Louise Smail Emergency response Emergency Response Solicitors enforcement notices Engineering Engineering dispute Environment Agency environment law Environmental Environmental Agency Environmental damage Environmental Law environmental waste EU EU Procurement Europe Evidence Expert evidence expert witness falls from height Fatal Accidents fee for intervention Fees For Intervention FFI FIDIC Contracts fine Fines Fire Fire Claim fire claims fire damage fire damage lawyers fire sprinkler systems fireworks flood flood claim flood damage food hygiene Fracking fracking claims Fraudulent claims FSW Gross Negligence Manslaughter Guide to Adjudication H&S fine increases; health and safety fines; Health & Safety health & safety breach health & safety sentences health & safety sentencing guidelines health & safety sentencing large corporations health and safety health and safety Health and Safety Executive heave Higher Fines Honey Rose v R How to appoint an adjudicator HSE Insolvency insolvent insurance Insurance Act 2015 insurance bill Insurance Broker insurance claim insurance cover Insurance Disclosure Insurance Disclosure insurance dispute insurance dispute solicitors Insurance Warranties ISO 45001 join us joint venture Judicial Review latest news Law Lawyer legal 500 legal advice privilege Legal Expense Insurance legal professional privilege legal retainers Liability Liquidated Damages Litigation litigation privilege local bodies magistrates’ courts Major Property Damage Manufacturing Martinisation material breach Mediation Michael Appleby Micheal appleby modern methods of construction (MMC) modular construction Mr. Gutaj Notice of adjudication panel firms party wall Performance Bond planning powers of an adjudicator pre-fabrication procurement procurement injunction procurement model Property Damage property danage Public Contract Public Contracts Public Contracts Regulations public procurement public procurement challenges public procurement relationship public sector Publicity Order PUWER recruitment regulation 11 Relief Resolution riot Riot Compensation Act 2016 Risk Risk Assessment safety in the workplace Sanctions Self-build sentence sentencing sentencing guidelines Serious Fraud Office SME Sneller Sony specialist risk and safety consultant Statute Barred Sub-Contractors subrogation subsidance subsidence TCC TCC Guidance team Technology and Construction Court The Adjudicator’s Decision and Costs The Enterprise Act The Lord Young Reforms The Powers Of An Adjudicator The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 The referral notice and response Training tree root UK Underwriters Warehouse insurance Warranties waste water damage WEEE What is Adjudication? what should an adjudication refal notice contain work equipment

Search The Site

Accreditations

 

The Legal 500 - The Clients Guide to Law Firms


Contact Us Now For Advice And Guidance

Enter your name
Enter your surname
Enter your Email
Ask us a Question?