Search

BLOG

Insurers and Businesses Will Benefit From Riot Compensation Act 2016

Blog image

The world is an uncertain place at present.  If someone predicted even as little as 12 months ago that Britain would leave the EU, Donald Trump would be President of the United States and Marine Le Pen would be in the final running to be France’s next President, they would probably have been laughed out of the room.

No one is laughing now

With public emotion running high and an election coming up in six weeks, many businesses and insurers will be concerned about rioting, especially with memories of summer 2011 still relatively fresh in their minds.

Prior to the 2011 riots, damage from riots was governed by the Riots (Damages) Act 1886.  Written in the days before the internet, AI, mobile technology, even the car (Karl Benz patented the first automobile in 1885/86) – it was unsurprisingly seen as an inadequate piece of law in 2011.

Reading the riot act

The 1886 Act was not the first piece of legislation to cover rioting.  The Riot Act 1714 (removed only in 1973 by the Statute Law (Repeals) Act of that year) was tough on those who rioted.  Under the 1714 Act, if more than 12 people, “unlawfully, riotously, and tumultuously assembled together,” a Justice of the Peace (or other specified local official) could demand the assembly disperse within an hour and “peaceably to depart to their habitations or to their lawful business.”

If those assembled did not comply, they were liable to “suffer death” as felons.

Unfortunately, human nature has changed little in the last 297 years (although thankfully we no longer put criminals to death).  In August 2011, many businesses and insurers suffered significant loss and damage due to days of rioting.

And it could happen again.

The changes brought in by the Riot Compensation Act 2016

Although the Riots (Damages) Act 1886 enjoyed a long shelf life, it received a lot of criticism in recent years for being archaic and unsuitable for modern business life.  For example, under the 1886 Act, victims only had a 14-day window for which to make a claim.  It also failed to provide for vehicles, computers, and other essential work equipment ubiquitous in modern workplaces.  

The main features of the Riot Compensation Act 2016 are as follows:

  • claimants now have 42 days to provide notice of a claim and a further 90 days to provide evidence to support it         

  • if vehicles are not covered for riot damage under their vehicle insurance, protection is provided under the Act          

  • if goods are damaged, they will be replaced with new versions          

  • consequential losses, such as lost rent to landlords and loss of trade are not covered          

  • what constitutes a riot will be decided by the police and crime commissioners          

  • insurers who have met claims can claim compensation from the local policing body

The 2016 Act also provides for a £1 million cap on the amount that can be paid out on a single claim.

This cap may require businesses and landlords to review their insurance policies for damage caused by riots.

Originally, the government proposed that only businesses that turned over £2 million or less would be allowed to claim under the Riot Compensation Act 2016.  However, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) rejected this, stating only around a third of claims from the 2011 riots would have been allowed under this cap.

What businesses need to watch out for

The biggest trap for businesses is that consequential loss is not covered under the 2016 Act.  This means it is essential to have business interruption insurance to ensure you can pay your creditors and rent if you are unable to trade for a period after a riot. 

It is also vital to engage an emergency response team to manage your claim should your business be subject to damage by rioting.  Disputes between insurers and the insured can still arise; by instructing an experienced solicitor who can quickly collate evidence of damage and the circumstances that caused it, any dispute is likely to be resolved more quickly and cost-effectively.

Fisher Scoggins Waters are a London based law firm who are experts in construction, manufacturing and engineering law.  We act for insurers and insured.  If you would like more information about the Riot Compensation Act 2016, please phone us on 0207 993 6960.

Follow our company page on linkedin for future updates and our views on the latest developments

Please leave a comment

Enter the name you would like to appear on the comment.
(required)
Enter the email you would like to use to get updates. You email is not visible and can not be used by other users.
(required)
Enter you comment help.

 
  Post Comment

Book Launch - 27 November 2019

Will you be joining us?

HSE and Environment Agency prosecution: A new climate

27 November 2019 | Bloomsbury, 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP

Event Registration

First name
Surname
Email address
Any additional information
Post/Event URL
Post/Event Title
CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below.

Tag Cloud

‘fit for purpose’ obligations 2016 Adjudication adjudication lawyer Adjudication Notice Adjudication process appeal appointing an adjudicator Arbitration Artificial Intelligence Asbestos benefits of off-site construction bonfires book launch breach of contract Brexit Building Defects business interruption Business Interruption Insurance CDM CDM Regulations chambers and partners Charlotte Waters civil proceedings claim payments Claims client COMAH commercial contracts complex construction claims Compliance compulsory sprinklers in warehouses consequential loss construction Construction Construction & Engineering construction contract Construction contract dispute Construction contracts Construction dispute construction dispute lawyer construction dispute resolution construction dispute resolution solicitor construction dispute solicitors Construction Disputes Resolution Construction industry Construction Magazine contracts Contribution claim Corporate Manslaughter Corporate Responsibility costs criminal investigation criminal proceedings cut out fuse Defective Building Work Defective Premises Act developer developers disadvantages of off-site construction Disaster disaster claim Disasters Dispute dispute resolution Disputes DPA Dr Louise Smail Emergency response Emergency Response Solicitors enforcement notices Engineering Engineering dispute Environment Agency environment law Environmental Environmental Agency Environmental damage Environmental Law environmental waste EU EU Procurement Europe Evidence Expert evidence expert witness falls from height Fatal Accidents fee for intervention Fees For Intervention FFI FIDIC Contracts fine Fines Fire Fire Claim fire claims fire damage fire damage lawyers fire sprinkler systems fireworks flood flood claim flood damage food hygiene Fracking fracking claims Fraudulent claims FSW Gross Negligence Manslaughter Guide to Adjudication H&S fine increases; health and safety fines; Health & Safety health & safety breach health & safety sentences health & safety sentencing guidelines health & safety sentencing large corporations health and safety health and safety Health and Safety Executive heave Higher Fines Honey Rose v R How to appoint an adjudicator HSE Insolvency insolvent insurance Insurance Act 2015 insurance bill Insurance Broker insurance claim insurance cover Insurance Disclosure Insurance Disclosure insurance dispute insurance dispute solicitors Insurance Warranties ISO 45001 join us joint venture Judicial Review latest news Law Lawyer legal 500 legal advice privilege Legal Expense Insurance legal professional privilege legal retainers Liability Liquidated Damages Litigation litigation privilege local bodies magistrates’ courts Major Property Damage Manufacturing Martinisation material breach Mediation Michael Appleby Micheal appleby modern methods of construction (MMC) modular construction Mr. Gutaj Notice of adjudication panel firms party wall Performance Bond planning powers of an adjudicator pre-fabrication procurement procurement injunction procurement model Property Damage property danage Public Contract Public Contracts Public Contracts Regulations public procurement public procurement challenges public procurement relationship public sector Publicity Order PUWER recruitment regulation 11 Relief Resolution riot Riot Compensation Act 2016 Risk Risk Assessment safety in the workplace Sanctions Self-build sentence sentencing sentencing guidelines Serious Fraud Office SME Sneller Sony specialist risk and safety consultant Statute Barred Sub-Contractors subrogation subsidance subsidence TCC TCC Guidance team Technology and Construction Court The Adjudicator’s Decision and Costs The Enterprise Act The Lord Young Reforms The Powers Of An Adjudicator The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 The referral notice and response Training tree root UK Underwriters Warehouse insurance Warranties waste water damage WEEE What is Adjudication? what should an adjudication refal notice contain work equipment

Search The Site

Accreditations

 

The Legal 500 - The Clients Guide to Law Firms


Contact Us Now For Advice And Guidance

Enter your name
Enter your surname
Enter your Email
Ask us a Question?