Food Safety Fines on the Increase

Blog image

Since 1 February 2016 sentencing for food safety and hygiene offences has been subject to the Health and Safety Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Food Safety and Hygiene Offences: Definitive Guideline

In April 2019 the Sentencing Council published its impact assessment for the Guideline.  This reports that fines for food safety and hygiene offences and the prosecution of directors and senior managers have increased following its introduction.

Fines And Custodial Sentence

The Guideline applies to offences pursuant to regulation 19(1) of the Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013 in England and in Wales, regulation 17(1) of the Food Hygiene (Wales) Regulations 2006 and regulation 4 of the General Food Regulations 2004.  The offence range for organisations is a fine from £100 to £3m. Convicted individuals can receive a custodial sentence of up to 2 years if tried in the crown court.

Food safety offences are strict liability criminal offences.  They can be committed without any intention to breach the law.  However there is a defence of ‘due diligence’.  This requires the organisation to prove ‘on a balance of probabilities’ that:

(i)                  It took all reasonable precautions to avoid the offence (this means that the organisation had a proper management system of procedures to prevent the offence in place); and

(ii)                It exercised due diligence in operating that system.

The impact assessment found that the number of organisations sentenced for food safety and hygiene offences between 2013 and 2016 has more than doubled from 60 in 2013 to 130 in 2016.  Since then the numbers have remained stable.  In 2017 94% of organisations received a fine.  The Guideline has resulted in the average fine increasing from £2,200 to £7,100.

The number of individuals prosecuted increased from 180 in 2015 to 260 in 2017 (an increase of over 40%).  A fine was imposed in 92% of cases, 3% of convicted defendants received a suspended custodial sentence, 2% received a community order and less than 1% received an immediate custodial sentence.

In general terms, for all offences sentenced under the Guideline, the impact assessment found that fewer appeals against sentence have been successful over the last three years.

Fisher Scoggins Waters are a London based law firm who represent organisations and individuals facing investigation or prosecution for food safety offences. If you require legal advice, please phone us on 0207 993 6960. 

Follow our company page on linkedin for future updates and our views on the latest developments

Categories: Health & Safety

Please leave a comment

Enter the name you would like to appear on the comment.
Enter the email you would like to use to get updates. You email is not visible and can not be used by other users.
Enter you comment help.

Enter the code shown above in the box below.
  Post Comment

Event Registration

First name
Email address
Any additional information
Post/Event URL
Post/Event Title
Enter the code shown above in the box below.

Tag Cloud

‘fit for purpose’ obligations 2016 Adjudication adjudication lawyer Adjudication Notice Adjudication process appeal appointing an adjudicator Arbitration Artificial Intelligence Asbestos benefits of off-site construction bonfires breach of contract Brexit Building Defects business interruption Business Interruption Insurance CDM CDM Regulations chambers and partners Charlotte Waters civil proceedings claim payments Claims client COMAH commercial contracts complex construction claims Compliance compulsory sprinklers in warehouses consequential loss construction Construction Construction & Engineering construction contract Construction contract dispute Construction contracts Construction dispute construction dispute lawyer construction dispute resolution construction dispute resolution solicitor construction dispute solicitors Construction Disputes Resolution Construction industry Construction Magazine contracts Contribution claim Corporate Manslaughter Corporate Responsibility costs criminal investigation criminal proceedings cut out fuse Defective Building Work Defective Premises Act developer developers disadvantages of off-site construction Disaster disaster claim Disasters Dispute dispute resolution Disputes Dr Louise Smail Emergency response Emergency Response Solicitors enforcement notices Engineering Engineering dispute Environment Agency environment law Environmental Environmental Agency Environmental damage Environmental Law environmental waste EU EU Procurement Europe Evidence Expert evidence expert witness falls from height Fatal Accidents fee for intervention Fees For Intervention FFI FIDIC Contracts fine Fines Fire Fire Claim fire claims fire damage fire damage lawyers fire sprinkler systems fireworks flood flood claim flood damage food hygiene Fracking fracking claims Fraudulent claims FSW Gross Negligence Manslaughter Guide to Adjudication H&S fine increases; health and safety fines; Health & Safety health & safety breach health & safety sentences health & safety sentencing guidelines health & safety sentencing large corporations health and safety health and safety Health and Safety Executive heave Higher Fines Honey Rose v R How to appoint an adjudicator HSE Insolvency insolvent insurance Insurance Act 2015 insurance bill Insurance Broker insurance claim insurance cover Insurance Disclosure Insurance Disclosure insurance dispute insurance dispute solicitors Insurance Warranties ISO 45001 join us joint venture Judicial Review latest news Law Lawyer legal 500 legal advice privilege Legal Expense Insurance legal professional privilege legal retainers Liability Liquidated Damages Litigation litigation privilege local bodies magistrates’ courts Major Property Damage Manufacturing Martinisation material breach Mediation Michael Appleby Micheal appleby modern methods of construction (MMC) modular construction Mr. Gutaj Notice of adjudication panel firms party wall Performance Bond planning powers of an adjudicator pre-fabrication procurement procurement injunction procurement model Property Damage property danage Public Contract Public Contracts Public Contracts Regulations public procurement public procurement challenges public procurement relationship public sector Publicity Order PUWER recruitment regulation 11 Relief Resolution riot Riot Compensation Act 2016 Risk Risk Assessment safety in the workplace Sanctions Self-build sentence sentencing sentencing guidelines Serious Fraud Office SME Sneller Sony specialist risk and safety consultant Statute Barred Sub-Contractors subrogation subsidance subsidence TCC TCC Guidance team Technology and Construction Court The Adjudicator’s Decision and Costs The Enterprise Act The Lord Young Reforms The Powers Of An Adjudicator The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 The referral notice and response Training tree root UK Underwriters Warehouse insurance Warranties waste water damage WEEE What is Adjudication? what should an adjudication refal notice contain work equipment

Search The Site



The Legal 500 - The Clients Guide to Law Firms

Contact Us Now For Advice And Guidance

Enter your name
Enter your surname
Enter your Email
Ask us a Question?