Search

BLOG

New Sentencing Guidelines Propose Harsh Prison Sentences For Gross Negligence Manslaughter

Blog image

On 4th July 2017, the Sentencing Council announced a consultation on its proposals for new sentencing for the offence of manslaughter in England and Wales.

Health and safety cases have been singled out for increases in prison terms, with sentences of up to 18 years being proposed in the most serious cases.

Reporting on the consultation on 4 July 2017 The Daily Telegraph, under the heading ‘Judges told to issue tougher sentences for gross negligence manslaughter in the wake of Grenfell and Hatfield’ reported:

 “The new sentencing rules for gross negligence manslaughter published today propose that “cost cutting” offenders who have a “serious disregard” for safety of others should receive more severe penalties.”

  

What is gross negligence manslaughter?

Gross negligence manslaughter is where a person who owes a duty of care breaches that duty, which in turn causes (or contributes to) the death of the victim, and having regard to the risk involved, the offender’s conduct was so bad as to amount to a criminal act or omission.  In a press release, published by the Sentencing Council, it said that gross negligence manslaughter can cover cases involving health and safety breaches at work.  One of the case studies given concerns a fatality at a construction site.

How are the proposed sentencing guidelines for gross negligence manslaughter set out?

The proposed guidelines are set out in a step-by-step guide that judges must follow when determining sentences.

The first step involves assessing the culpability of the offender.  The sentencing judge must consider the context of the negligent act or omission that caused death, the role the offender played, their understanding of the risk of death, the length of time the negligence persisted, and how they acted after the event.

Culpability is then separated into four categories; very high, high, medium and lower. 

An example of high culpability is where the offender persisted in the negligent act or omission despite the fact the victim was suffering or was motivated by financial gain.  Low culpability may be found if the offender never intended to cause any harm to the deceased and there was no obvious risk of anything more than minor harm occurring.

Once the culpability level has been established, the sentencing judge must identify a starting point.  The range of sentences (from one year to 18 years’ imprisonment) is spread over the four categories so there will be only four possible starting points; 12 years, 8 years, 4 years and 2 years for culpabilities of ‘very high’, ‘high’, ‘medium’ and ‘low’, respectively. 

Additional factors which may aggravate or mitigate the offence should then be considered by the sentencing judge and appropriate weight attributed to them.

Aggravating factors can include:

  • previous convictions          

  • significant mental or physical suffering caused to the deceased        

  • the victim’s death occurred in the context of dishonesty or the pursuit of financial gain          

  • attempts were made to cover up the event         

  • the offender tried to place the blame for the victim’s death on others  

Mitigating factors may include:

  • no previous convictions          

  • the offender shows genuine remorse          

  • the offender has previously shown past good character/exemplary conduct         

  • the offender is the sole, primary carer for dependent relatives

Changing climate?

On 30 June 2017 construction manager Andrew Winterton, after a nine-week trial, was jailed for gross negligence manslaughter, after a workman was crushed to death on a building site. Winterton, was in charge of the site, being developed by his company Conquest Homes. In September 2014, the walls of a deep trench at the site collapsed, crushing workman Shane Wilkinson who was standing near the edge. Under the new proposals, it is likely that Winterton would have received a longer prison sentence.

Business owners wishing to respond to the consultation  have until 10th October 2017.  The guidelines are expected to come into force for sentences imposed from December 2018.

Fisher Scoggins Waters is a London based law firm who are experts in construction, manufacturing and engineering law.  If you have any questions about health and safety matters or require an emergency response to an incident, please phone us on 0207 993 6960.

Follow our company page on linkedin for future updates and our views on the latest developments

Categories: Health & Safety

Please leave a comment

Enter the name you would like to appear on the comment.
(required)
Enter the email you would like to use to get updates. You email is not visible and can not be used by other users.
(required)
Enter you comment help.

 
  Post Comment

Book Launch - 27 November 2019

Will you be joining us?

HSE and Environment Agency prosecution: A new climate

27 November 2019 | Bloomsbury, 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP

Event Registration

First name
Surname
Email address
Any additional information
Post/Event URL
Post/Event Title
CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below.

Tag Cloud

‘fit for purpose’ obligations 2016 Adjudication adjudication lawyer Adjudication Notice Adjudication process appeal appointing an adjudicator Arbitration Artificial Intelligence Asbestos benefits of off-site construction bonfires book launch breach of contract Brexit Building Defects business interruption Business Interruption Insurance CDM CDM Regulations chambers and partners Charlotte Waters civil proceedings claim payments Claims client COMAH commercial contracts complex construction claims Compliance compulsory sprinklers in warehouses consequential loss construction Construction Construction & Engineering construction contract Construction contract dispute Construction contracts Construction dispute construction dispute lawyer construction dispute resolution construction dispute resolution solicitor construction dispute solicitors Construction Disputes Resolution Construction industry Construction Magazine contracts Contribution claim Corporate Manslaughter Corporate Responsibility costs criminal investigation criminal proceedings cut out fuse Defective Building Work Defective Premises Act developer developers disadvantages of off-site construction Disaster disaster claim Disasters Dispute dispute resolution Disputes DPA Dr Louise Smail Emergency response Emergency Response Solicitors enforcement notices Engineering Engineering dispute Environment Agency environment law Environmental Environmental Agency Environmental damage Environmental Law environmental waste EU EU Procurement Europe Evidence Expert evidence expert witness falls from height Fatal Accidents fee for intervention Fees For Intervention FFI FIDIC Contracts fine Fines Fire Fire Claim fire claims fire damage fire damage lawyers fire sprinkler systems fireworks flood flood claim flood damage food hygiene Fracking fracking claims Fraudulent claims FSW Gross Negligence Manslaughter Guide to Adjudication H&S fine increases; health and safety fines; Health & Safety health & safety breach health & safety sentences health & safety sentencing guidelines health & safety sentencing large corporations health and safety health and safety Health and Safety Executive heave Higher Fines Honey Rose v R How to appoint an adjudicator HSE Insolvency insolvent insurance Insurance Act 2015 insurance bill Insurance Broker insurance claim insurance cover Insurance Disclosure Insurance Disclosure insurance dispute insurance dispute solicitors Insurance Warranties ISO 45001 join us joint venture Judicial Review latest news Law Lawyer legal 500 legal advice privilege Legal Expense Insurance legal professional privilege legal retainers Liability Liquidated Damages Litigation litigation privilege local bodies magistrates’ courts Major Property Damage Manufacturing Martinisation material breach Mediation Michael Appleby Micheal appleby modern methods of construction (MMC) modular construction Mr. Gutaj Notice of adjudication panel firms party wall Performance Bond planning powers of an adjudicator pre-fabrication procurement procurement injunction procurement model Property Damage property danage Public Contract Public Contracts Public Contracts Regulations public procurement public procurement challenges public procurement relationship public sector Publicity Order PUWER recruitment regulation 11 Relief Resolution riot Riot Compensation Act 2016 Risk Risk Assessment safety in the workplace Sanctions Self-build sentence sentencing sentencing guidelines Serious Fraud Office SME Sneller Sony specialist risk and safety consultant Statute Barred Sub-Contractors subrogation subsidance subsidence TCC TCC Guidance team Technology and Construction Court The Adjudicator’s Decision and Costs The Enterprise Act The Lord Young Reforms The Powers Of An Adjudicator The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 The referral notice and response Training tree root UK Underwriters Warehouse insurance Warranties waste water damage WEEE What is Adjudication? what should an adjudication refal notice contain work equipment

Search The Site

Accreditations

 

The Legal 500 - The Clients Guide to Law Firms


Contact Us Now For Advice And Guidance

Enter your name
Enter your surname
Enter your Email
Ask us a Question?