Search

BLOG

Procurement and Brexit – What are the Implications?

Blog image

Prior to Great Britain joining the European Community (EC) in 1973, there was little in the way of regulation around procurement law in the UK.  With June 23rd fast approaching, are we about to turn back the clock and return to a time of fairly unregulated procurement policies if Britain chose to exit the EU?  Or, as appears to be the case in most regulations in the case of a Brexit, is nothing much likely to change procurement wise if Britain wants to continue having free access to the EU market?

The Appetite for Challenge

In the early seventies, public bodies faced few challenges to their procurement decisions.  This has now changed, and most providers take for granted that they can question a decision that they believe was made unfairly.  This in turn keeps public bodies on their toes and committed to following correct practices and procedures when procuring goods and services.

Reducing Procurement Regulations

David Cameron has made clear that one of the key negotiation points between Britain and the EU is the reduction in red-tape, allowing for greater competitiveness across all sectors. Many suppliers would welcome a review of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 if Britain voted to leave the EU, given the low thresholds under the Regulations; which is as little as £113,057 for the procurement of supplies and ‘Part A’ services by Central Government bodies.

However, this may not be as simple as it first appears.  Until negotiations are complete and a plan is made for new procurement rules (if they are to be amended), the status quo will have to stay in place.  This is not likely to happen in a hurry, not only because the legislative process inherently takes time, but because Britain is likely to still engage in EU trading through the European Free Trade Association, World Trade Organisation and bilateral trade agreements, all of which will take many years to negotiate and finalise.

The other point to make is, if the regulations were to change, although the frameworks for tender put together by public sector bodies could be streamlined to bring down the cost of participation, the process would still be subject to judicial review.  It is difficult to see how major changes could be implemented, given that the framework and review process would need to remain in place.

Speaking of organisations such as the European Free Trade Association, it should be pointed out that members are bound by EU rules on public procurement.  If Britain were to leave the EU, its ability to influence regulation and procedure would be severely curtailed, but the most likely scenario is that EU rules would still apply to most areas of procurement.

EU procurement market backlash?

Some commentators have noted that the EU has long desired to close off access to EU procurement contracts from companies residing in states that do not provide reciprocal and enforceable access to their own public procurement markets.  In March 2012, the European Commission tabled a proposal for a regulation giving to it the right to block access to EU public procurement markets for foreign firms originating from countries not delivering enough “reciprocity.”  This was blocked by a variety of countries, with the UK being one of the most vocal opponents.

If Britain were to leave the EU and this concept was tabled again, there is a good chance that without Britain’s voting power, it may be passed.  To avoid this situation damaging British companies’ ability to access the EU procurement market, the Government is likely to put in place a similarly reciprocal and enforceable regime, which would be, you guessed it, similar to what is in place now.

Conclusion

Despite all the media dramatics around a Brexit and the fallout it may have on the British economy, for the procurement market at least, things are unlikely to change dramatically, and any movement towards tweaking the regulations to suit UK businesses more favourable are likely to occur slowly, giving the market ample time to adjust.

We will watch with interest and keep you posted.

Fisher Scoggins Waters are a London based law firm who are experts in construction, manufacturing and engineering matters.    If you would like to discuss any points raised in this article, please phone us on 0207 993 6960.

Follow our company page on linkedin for future updates and our views on the latest developments

Please leave a comment

Enter the name you would like to appear on the comment.
(required)
Enter the email you would like to use to get updates. You email is not visible and can not be used by other users.
(required)
Enter you comment help.

 
  Post Comment

Book Launch - 27 November 2019

Will you be joining us?

HSE and Environment Agency prosecution: A new climate

27 November 2019 | Bloomsbury, 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP

Event Registration

First name
Surname
Email address
Any additional information
Post/Event URL
Post/Event Title
CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below.

Tag Cloud

‘fit for purpose’ obligations 2016 Adjudication adjudication lawyer Adjudication Notice Adjudication process appeal appointing an adjudicator Arbitration Artificial Intelligence Asbestos benefits of off-site construction bonfires book launch breach of contract Brexit Building Defects business interruption Business Interruption Insurance CDM CDM Regulations chambers and partners Charlotte Waters civil proceedings claim payments Claims client COMAH commercial contracts complex construction claims Compliance compulsory sprinklers in warehouses consequential loss construction Construction Construction & Engineering construction contract Construction contract dispute Construction contracts Construction dispute construction dispute lawyer construction dispute resolution construction dispute resolution solicitor construction dispute solicitors Construction Disputes Resolution Construction industry Construction Magazine contracts Contribution claim Corporate Manslaughter Corporate Responsibility costs criminal investigation criminal proceedings cut out fuse Defective Building Work Defective Premises Act developer developers disadvantages of off-site construction Disaster disaster claim Disasters Dispute dispute resolution Disputes DPA Dr Louise Smail Emergency response Emergency Response Solicitors enforcement notices Engineering Engineering dispute Environment Agency environment law Environmental Environmental Agency Environmental damage Environmental Law environmental waste EU EU Procurement Europe Evidence Expert evidence expert witness falls from height Fatal Accidents fee for intervention Fees For Intervention FFI FIDIC Contracts fine Fines Fire Fire Claim fire claims fire damage fire damage lawyers fire sprinkler systems fireworks flood flood claim flood damage food hygiene Fracking fracking claims Fraudulent claims FSW Gross Negligence Manslaughter Guide to Adjudication H&S fine increases; health and safety fines; Health & Safety health & safety breach health & safety sentences health & safety sentencing guidelines health & safety sentencing large corporations health and safety health and safety Health and Safety Executive heave Higher Fines Honey Rose v R How to appoint an adjudicator HSE Insolvency insolvent insurance Insurance Act 2015 insurance bill Insurance Broker insurance claim insurance cover Insurance Disclosure Insurance Disclosure insurance dispute insurance dispute solicitors Insurance Warranties ISO 45001 join us joint venture Judicial Review latest news Law Lawyer legal 500 legal advice privilege Legal Expense Insurance legal professional privilege legal retainers Liability Liquidated Damages Litigation litigation privilege local bodies magistrates’ courts Major Property Damage Manufacturing Martinisation material breach Mediation Michael Appleby Micheal appleby modern methods of construction (MMC) modular construction Mr. Gutaj Notice of adjudication panel firms party wall Performance Bond planning powers of an adjudicator pre-fabrication procurement procurement injunction procurement model Property Damage property danage Public Contract Public Contracts Public Contracts Regulations public procurement public procurement challenges public procurement relationship public sector Publicity Order PUWER recruitment regulation 11 Relief Resolution riot Riot Compensation Act 2016 Risk Risk Assessment safety in the workplace Sanctions Self-build sentence sentencing sentencing guidelines Serious Fraud Office SME Sneller Sony specialist risk and safety consultant Statute Barred Sub-Contractors subrogation subsidance subsidence TCC TCC Guidance team Technology and Construction Court The Adjudicator’s Decision and Costs The Enterprise Act The Lord Young Reforms The Powers Of An Adjudicator The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 The referral notice and response Training tree root UK Underwriters Warehouse insurance Warranties waste water damage WEEE What is Adjudication? what should an adjudication refal notice contain work equipment

Search The Site

Accreditations

 

The Legal 500 - The Clients Guide to Law Firms


Contact Us Now For Advice And Guidance

Enter your name
Enter your surname
Enter your Email
Ask us a Question?