Structural Damage and Failure
Claims
Fisher Scoggins
Waters' knowledge of geotechnical and structural failure
claims (defective design, defective construction or
impact) means we are able to get to the heart of the problem
swiftly and work towards resolving any dispute.
Causes can vary from concrete failure, metallurgical
and welding failures, use of inappropriate materials,
and construction/design failure but essentially a
structural failure is loss or partial loss of the structures's
load -carrying capacity initiated when the material
(concrete, steelwork, masonry and timber) are stressed to its
limit causing fracture or deformation.
Experience and current cases involving structural failures
(complete losses - collapses and partial losses excessive
cracking/movement) include:

- Tunnels
- Bridges
- Utility pipelines
- Dams
- Roads
- Cooling Towers
- Chimneys
- Buildings (commercial and residential)
Some common defects include subsidence, heave, differential
movement and drainage, cavity tie corrosion, contamination of
concrete and metal fatigue.
Ground Movement
Our team understands the nature of heave and subsidence and the
disruption they can cause. Predicting and controlling ground
movements is often complex. We will put the right team in place
to ensure all relevant information is collected, preserved and
available to assess the merit of any claims.
Subsidence
Subsidence is the downward movement of the ground
surface and Heave is the upward movement of the ground
surface. The relationship between London Clay and tree roots is
commonly an unhappy one. Shrinkage could lead to subsidence and
expansion could lead to heave. Foundation depths in newer
structures are designed at minimum depth but where vegetation has
existed, does exist or will exist; greater depths are likely to
be required.
Defective Design
We advise on claims against architects and structural
engineers when it is said the service fell below that
provided by a reasonably competent professional for example by
providing incorrect advice, inadequately prepared plans,
inappropriate or inadequate supervision the project, failure to
keep a project within the specified budget, and where
inappropriate specification of materials was used.
Whether there is a cause of action or not will depend on a
number of factors (1) being able to establish the professional
owed a duty (2) that there was a failure to provide the services
in a way which could reasonably be expected; (3) that as a result
you have suffered a financial loss.
Construction Failures
Defects are one of the major causes of dispute in construction
litigation. Dealing with construction failures requires a
solid understanding of the law, construction terminology,
technology and practice.
There is a big difference between a construction defect
and a nuisance claims. Construction defects could range
from complex foundation and frame issues, which threaten the
structural integrity of the construction, to aesthetic issues
such as improperly finished surfaces.
All Risks Insurance Claims
For a large number of construction projects there will be in
place project insurance, which under one policy, covers
many of the interests of a number of project participants. Our
team is able to provide specialist advice in respect of
"loss of or damage to", and the various
defective design, material and workmanship - the "DE
clauses" and London Engineering Group "LEG"
series, defects in design and defectively designed.
Claims under Defective
Premises Act 1972
We defend claims in nuisance and under the Defective
Premises Act 1972. We also advise on the Defective Premises
Act (DPA) and in particular questions surrounding "Fit for
Habitation".
If you would like more information on how Fisher Scoggins Waters could make a difference
to your Property Damage Dispute, please contact us by telephone 0207 489 2035 or email
Charlotte Waters