Search

BLOG

Lessons That Can Be Learned From The Dreamworld Tragedy

Blog image

Tragedy struck Australia last week when four people were crushed to death in the country’s largest theme park.

The accident occurred on one of the park’s tamer rides, the Thunder River Rapids, which is seen as safe for small children. 

Both civil and criminal actions are likely to be brought against Ardent Leisure, the parent company that owns not only Dreamworld, but over 150 leisure assets across Australia. 

Merlin Attractions was handed a £5 million fine after management at its Alton Towers theme park admitted health and safety breaches over the Smiler rollercoaster crash in which two young women each lost a leg.  If Ardent Leisure is found guilty, the fines levied could also well run into the millions.

Crisis Management

A significant element of an emergency response is how the company acts in relation to the media, the victims’ families and the public following an incident.  It is so easy to place blame on management, accusing them of not ‘behaving’ appropriately or showing compassion.  This neglects the fact that CEOs are human beings.  Injury or death of an employee or member of the public whilst at the helm is a nightmare situation all managers dread and unfortunately, there is no clear rule book for how to best deal with such an event.

It is well established that in the case of a tragic event, the priority of management should be on contacting and offering assistance to the victims and their families.  However, often this is not done for fear of being seen to admit liability before the facts are known. But the loss of public opinion can be very hard to recover once lost.  In one of the more embarrassing revelations at a press conference, Ardent CEO Deborah Thomas said she had not called the families of victims because Ardent, “didn’t know how to contact them”.

Thomas Cook, who took over eight and a half years to apologise to the parents of two small children who died of carbon monoxide poisoning at the Louis Corcyra Beach Hotel in Corfu in 2006 because of fumes from a defective boiler, faced a storm of criticism on social media and had £75 million wiped off the value of its shares overnight, due to the way they dealt with the incident. 

During an inquest into the deaths of the youngsters, from Horbury, West Yorkshire, Thomas Cook chief executive Peter Fankhauser said he had, "nothing to apologise for".  Even worse in the eyes of the public, it emerged that the total compensation Thomas Cook received was £3 million and that its insurers had held on to the extra £1.5 million to cover its legal costs.

It is understood that the £3 million was around ten times the amount the parents received.

The benefits of a fast, experienced emergency response team

Social media has changed the way organisations must deal with a crisis, not only to protect their reputation with the public but also stop share prices plummeting and investors pulling out of funding agreements.


An emergency response team, experienced in health and safety law will ensure the right actions are taken, as soon as possible after the event occurs.  The way communication with police, HSE inspectors, fire and rescue and insurers are handled within the first few minutes, hours, days and weeks of an incident occurring can greatly affect the chance of criminal prosecution and/or civil action occurring.  Even if prosecution is inevitable, by engaging an emergency response team who can act swiftly and correctly, the level of fines imposed may be reduced.  

Given that the Health and Safety Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Food Safety and Hygiene Offences Definitive Guidelines (or Sentencing Guidelines as they are commonly known) require that the Courts to now base the level of fines for health and safety breaches on company turnover and makes it easier to send directors to prison, getting proper legal advice immediately after an event occurs is imperative.

In Summary

In today’s world where social media can crush a company’s reputation and share prices overnight in addition to a Government health and safety sentencing policy that can result in directors being jailed and organisations being crippled by massive fines, a call to an experienced emergency response team can make a big difference to the outcome if a tragedy occurs.

Fisher Scoggins Waters are a London based law firm who are specialise in construction, manufacturing and engineering law.  We can provide an emergency response following a disaster involving serious injury or loss of life and can be on-site within hours (depending on the location).  Please phone us on 0207 993 6960.

Follow our company page on linkedin for future updates and our views on the latest developments

Categories: Health & Safety

Please leave a comment

Enter the name you would like to appear on the comment.
(required)
Enter the email you would like to use to get updates. You email is not visible and can not be used by other users.
(required)
Enter you comment help.

 
  Post Comment

Book Launch - 27 November 2019

Will you be joining us?

HSE and Environment Agency prosecution: A new climate

27 November 2019 | Bloomsbury, 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP

Event Registration

First name
Surname
Email address
Any additional information
Post/Event URL
Post/Event Title
CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below.

Tag Cloud

‘fit for purpose’ obligations 2016 Adjudication adjudication lawyer Adjudication Notice Adjudication process appeal appointing an adjudicator Arbitration Artificial Intelligence Asbestos benefits of off-site construction bonfires book launch breach of contract Brexit Building Defects business interruption Business Interruption Insurance CDM CDM Regulations chambers and partners Charlotte Waters civil proceedings claim payments Claims client COMAH commercial contracts complex construction claims Compliance compulsory sprinklers in warehouses consequential loss construction Construction Construction & Engineering construction contract Construction contract dispute Construction contracts Construction dispute construction dispute lawyer construction dispute resolution construction dispute resolution solicitor construction dispute solicitors Construction Disputes Resolution Construction industry Construction Magazine contracts Contribution claim Corporate Manslaughter Corporate Responsibility costs criminal investigation criminal proceedings cut out fuse Defective Building Work Defective Premises Act developer developers disadvantages of off-site construction Disaster disaster claim Disasters Dispute dispute resolution Disputes DPA Dr Louise Smail Emergency response Emergency Response Solicitors enforcement notices Engineering Engineering dispute Environment Agency environment law Environmental Environmental Agency Environmental damage Environmental Law environmental waste EU EU Procurement Europe Evidence Expert evidence expert witness falls from height Fatal Accidents fee for intervention Fees For Intervention FFI FIDIC Contracts fine Fines Fire Fire Claim fire claims fire damage fire damage lawyers fire sprinkler systems fireworks flood flood claim flood damage food hygiene Fracking fracking claims Fraudulent claims FSW Gross Negligence Manslaughter Guide to Adjudication H&S fine increases; health and safety fines; Health & Safety health & safety breach health & safety sentences health & safety sentencing guidelines health & safety sentencing large corporations health and safety health and safety Health and Safety Executive heave Higher Fines Honey Rose v R How to appoint an adjudicator HSE Insolvency insolvent insurance Insurance Act 2015 insurance bill Insurance Broker insurance claim insurance cover Insurance Disclosure Insurance Disclosure insurance dispute insurance dispute solicitors Insurance Warranties ISO 45001 join us joint venture Judicial Review latest news Law Lawyer legal 500 legal advice privilege Legal Expense Insurance legal professional privilege legal retainers Liability Liquidated Damages Litigation litigation privilege local bodies magistrates’ courts Major Property Damage Manufacturing Martinisation material breach Mediation Michael Appleby Micheal appleby modern methods of construction (MMC) modular construction Mr. Gutaj Notice of adjudication panel firms party wall Performance Bond planning powers of an adjudicator pre-fabrication procurement procurement injunction procurement model Property Damage property danage Public Contract Public Contracts Public Contracts Regulations public procurement public procurement challenges public procurement relationship public sector Publicity Order PUWER recruitment regulation 11 Relief Resolution riot Riot Compensation Act 2016 Risk Risk Assessment safety in the workplace Sanctions Self-build sentence sentencing sentencing guidelines Serious Fraud Office SME Sneller Sony specialist risk and safety consultant Statute Barred Sub-Contractors subrogation subsidance subsidence TCC TCC Guidance team Technology and Construction Court The Adjudicator’s Decision and Costs The Enterprise Act The Lord Young Reforms The Powers Of An Adjudicator The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 The referral notice and response Training tree root UK Underwriters Warehouse insurance Warranties waste water damage WEEE What is Adjudication? what should an adjudication refal notice contain work equipment

Search The Site

Accreditations

 

The Legal 500 - The Clients Guide to Law Firms


Contact Us Now For Advice And Guidance

Enter your name
Enter your surname
Enter your Email
Ask us a Question?